Comments on: ICANN in Russia, April 2007 http://blog.icann.org/2007/04/icann-in-russia-april-2007/ Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:20:28 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Horses http://blog.icann.org/2007/04/icann-in-russia-april-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-10348 Horses Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:12:47 +0000 http://blog.icann.org/?p=91#comment-10348 So what came of the discussions on .su? So what came of the discussions on .su?

]]> By: Veni Markovski http://blog.icann.org/2007/04/icann-in-russia-april-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2191 Veni Markovski Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:13:08 +0000 http://blog.icann.org/?p=91#comment-2191 You can read the latest news on that here: <a href=http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-02jun07.htm rel="nofollow">http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-02jun07.htm</a> You can read the latest news on that here: http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-02jun07.htm

]]> By: tercume ceviri http://blog.icann.org/2007/04/icann-in-russia-april-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2186 tercume ceviri Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:43:15 +0000 http://blog.icann.org/?p=91#comment-2186 when is your visit to istanbul/ankara or turkey? are there any improvements about the use of turkish characters in domain names? when is your visit to istanbul/ankara or turkey? are there any improvements about the use of turkish characters in domain names?

]]> By: david Conrad http://blog.icann.org/2007/04/icann-in-russia-april-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-1515 david Conrad Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:57:36 +0000 http://blog.icann.org/?p=91#comment-1515 "In December 2006 ICANN/IANA had an unacceptable attempt to address a policy matter outside of its remit, namely retirying ccTLD codes from the root" ICANN/IANA did not attempt to address a policy matter outside its remit. We asked for input on how to deal with the fact that existing policy was not being followed. Specifically, ISO-3166/MA moved some code elements to transitionally reserved (that is, to quote from the ISO-3166-1 decoding table: "Code element deleted from ISO 3166-1; stop using ASAP.") yet the top-level domains assoicated with those deleted codes are still in use which is at odds with RFC 1591. If you read the call for comments you reference, you'll see it was merely trying to determine what the community thought we should do. I personally believe asking questions about the policies IANA operates under is within ICANN/IANA's remit. Regards, -drc “In December 2006 ICANN/IANA had an unacceptable attempt to address a policy matter outside of its remit, namely retirying ccTLD codes from the root”

ICANN/IANA did not attempt to address a policy matter outside its remit. We asked for input on how to deal with the fact that existing policy was not being followed. Specifically, ISO-3166/MA moved some code elements to transitionally reserved (that is, to quote from the ISO-3166-1 decoding table: “Code element deleted from ISO 3166-1; stop using ASAP.”) yet the top-level domains assoicated with those deleted codes are still in use which is at odds with RFC 1591. If you read the call for comments you reference, you’ll see it was merely trying to determine what the community thought we should do. I personally believe asking questions about the policies IANA operates under is within ICANN/IANA’s remit.

Regards,
-drc

]]> By: Veni Markovski http://blog.icann.org/2007/04/icann-in-russia-april-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-1480 Veni Markovski Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:06:25 +0000 http://blog.icann.org/?p=91#comment-1480 Target, yes, the url is in cyrillic, but there's nothing to worry there (or, to be more precise - there wasn't when I was checking it:). Yellowrose, as for the .su, yes - we talked with the relevant people on the .su situation, and we hope there will be progress there, as well. Target,
yes, the url is in cyrillic, but there’s nothing to worry there (or, to be more precise – there wasn’t when I was checking it:).

Yellowrose,
as for the .su, yes – we talked with the relevant people on the .su situation, and we hope there will be progress there, as well.

]]> By: yellowrose http://blog.icann.org/2007/04/icann-in-russia-april-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-1468 yellowrose Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:36:26 +0000 http://blog.icann.org/?p=91#comment-1468 Some of the people running .ru also run .su (FID is in charge of .su, cf. http://www.fid.ru/english/about/) . In December 2006 ICANN/IANA had an unacceptable attempt to address a policy matter outside of its remit, namely retirying ccTLD codes from the root, cf. http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-05dec06.htm Did you discuss .su matters in Moscow, and if yes, could you brief on that? Some of the people running .ru also run .su (FID is in charge of .su, cf. http://www.fid.ru/english/about/) . In December 2006 ICANN/IANA had an unacceptable attempt to address a policy matter outside of its remit, namely retirying ccTLD codes from the root, cf. http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-05dec06.htm
Did you discuss .su matters in Moscow, and if yes, could you brief on that?

]]> By: Target http://blog.icann.org/2007/04/icann-in-russia-april-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-1467 Target Sun, 15 Apr 2007 07:39:42 +0000 http://blog.icann.org/?p=91#comment-1467 Kyrillic URI http://www.rans.ru/arrangements/conf_secure2007/ has been opened with MyBrowser; hopefully secured by Kaspersky and MicroHard eXtended Protection I did close the window because this Language and Notation. is not familiar to me. Sorry for any scepticism about "http://" and "mime-enriched" URL's. Kyrillic URI http://www.rans.ru/arrangements/conf_secure2007/ has been opened with MyBrowser; hopefully secured by Kaspersky and MicroHard eXtended Protection I did close the window because this Language and Notation. is not familiar to me. Sorry for any scepticism about “http://” and “mime-enriched” URL’s.

]]>