RegisterFly Update 22 May, 2007

by Paul Levins on May 22, 2007

ICANN has been advised of a deal to transfer all names in RegisterFly’s management from RegisterFly to an existing accredited Registrar with a demonstrated record of customer service. This would be a quick and effective solution to many of the problems that registrants are presently experiencing with RegisterFly. The deal, which has been confirmed with the registrar, is a commercial transaction (where the acquiring registrar has worked out a financial arrangement to take over names managed by RegisterFly).

In order to make the transfer happen, all data must be provided to the acquiring registrar by RegisterFly. We have been informed that most of the data has been now made available. Final steps are underway to effect the full transfer of information which should be completed next week, with an announcement by the acquiring registrar to be made at that time.

In related news, US Federal District Court Judge Real has compelled the personal appearance of Kevin Medina before the court on Friday, 25 May 2007 to show cause why RegisterFly should not again be held in contempt of court and be further sanctioned. Kevin Medina has not so far appeared personally in this matter. ICANN will appear, and has reserved the right to take additional action before that time pursuant to the court’s orders, particularly if the RegisterFly transfer falls off the schedule outlined above.

We will continue to update you as new information becomes available. We understand how difficult these circumstances are and will continue to concentrate on getting the best possible outcome we can for registrants.

{ 1 trackback }

home » Comment on RegisterFly Update 22 May, 2007 by Make Money From Home
11.14.07 at 8:38 pm

{ 94 comments }

Jeremy 05.22.07 at 1:01 pm

Thanks for the update… You guys don’t know how much some news is appreciated.

Paul Levins 05.22.07 at 1:13 pm

Jeremy

We do know communication is important. That’s why we are using this blog - so we can have more of a dialogue with all concerned here.

It’s just that it is sometimes hard for us to pass on information because it can jeopardise delicate commercial and legal discussions that may produce outcomes beneficial to everyone involved. I know that when you are a business relying on the good management of a domain name, you just want the problem fixed. As I said in the blog post, we are working to get the best overall long-term result for registrants.

Thanks for your patience.

Paul Levins

WK 05.22.07 at 2:25 pm

One question Paul, for the communicate of Network Solutions the other day, i think is Netsol, but my question is…

Is the gaining Registrar one of the big 10 ? I not ask for the years have in the business because that is a good hint.

Paul Levins 05.22.07 at 2:32 pm

WK

As I said in the post - it is an accredited registrar with a record of customer service and satisfaction. I’m sorry to appear secretive. That’s not the intention. But it would be unfair of me to announce their business. We are anxious that we not do anything to disturb what is a business transaction that will be in the interests of registrants.

Paul

Phill K 05.22.07 at 2:39 pm

I really would like to see my RF account data from a year ago.

Gene Steinberg 05.22.07 at 2:39 pm

I hope and trust, then, that t his is not GoDaddy, which certainly does not have “a record of customer service and satisfaction.”

Peace,
Gene

Paul Levins 05.22.07 at 2:50 pm

Gene

There will always be examples of poor service with any registrar. That’s a feature of the size of the market these days as well as varying ideas about what good service is. Indeed it was only a little while back on this very blog that some people were saying RegisterFly’s service was fine for them.

So it underscores the point that this is a competitive marketplace. That’s a good thing but it means exercising your choice if you are not happy with your registrar.

Paul

Carter 05.22.07 at 3:28 pm

I’ve had nothing but good experiences with GoDaddy.

In any case, it will be nice to see this RF mess finally begin to get cleared up and safeguards installed to insure this never happens again.

With a little luck Medina will be behind bars this weekend (or on the run).

richard 05.22.07 at 5:19 pm

I have several hundred dollars stuck in my Registerfly account. What happens to this money?

Chuck 05.22.07 at 5:48 pm

Carter - Your comments are good and to the point.

The unfortunately part of all of this is that white-collar criminals usually serve very short jail sentences and much much more-importantly, those companies, including mine, that were continually forced to lay-off people (including two today) and lost tens of thousands of dollars in time and income directly as a result of Medina’s actions…will probably never see a dime from Registerfly, commercial deal or not …due to the sheer magnitude and time-line of this ordeal. Maybe the acquiring registrar (hopefully, it IS GoDaddy) will consider setting up some sort of matching fund to help out those that have entirely lose their businesses due to this very unfortunate chapter in Internet history.
We were very lucky to survive this long. More than 50% of our business ceased directly as a result of Medina’s actions (and the decision by the judge in New Jersey when ’some’ progress was being made)…..

ck 05.22.07 at 6:58 pm

The lack of information and guidance is terrible. RF has been silent all year while domains and renewal payments simply disappear. In such an event, you would expect ICANN to take a responsible role, just like the federal banking insurance would. We contribute to it just like we contribute to ICANN and deserve better than having our assets wiped out. If ICANN should lack the necessary authority, it should get it, soon.

At this time, ICANN needs to assure all those who lost domains with RF that they will be fully reinstated, without the domains falling into the open market.

JWade 05.22.07 at 7:24 pm

I own 923 domains which were purchased at RegisterFly. Over half of those domains are still with Enom. Last week I set up an Enom account and faxed them the identifying information they wanted, but they have not yet moved my domains into my Enom acoount. I have almost 400 domains which need renewing within the next 30 days, many are due within 10 days, and all these are are at Enom. I’ve read very little from ICANN about Enom’s legal responsibilities in this mess, and many complaints from registrants about their role. Does this pending transfer agreement also affect those domains which were bought at RegisterFly when they were an Enom reseller, and for which the WhoIs data still shows Enom as the registrar? If not, what is ICANN requiring of ENOM as the current registrar for many of the domains still carried at RegisterFly? Also, what provisions are being made for transfer of domains that have been stolen by RegisterFly? I have 8 domains which have had the registrations changed to RegisterFly.

lasard 05.22.07 at 7:33 pm

I just wonder if any of these guys at ICANN used Registerfly

If you “staff at ICANN” had problems it was probably forced via the “system” to another registrar and very hush hush no problemo.

Personally I feel that we “the people paying your salaries” will be forced by the new registrar to pay enormous amounts of money and be extorted again.

The new registrar is probably hiring new staff as we speak to cope with the huge influx of cash of which you will also receive your share of course.

I bet Registerfly would’ve come out of this unscathed if they “Registerfly” paid you the money they owe you.

I have lost a lot in this ordeal. And while I wait patiently for the big guys to finish feasting on the corpse called registerfly, I can rest assured that daily the lifeblood of thousands of people get sucked up with it.

At least you guys can sleep easy tonight.

spenser 05.22.07 at 8:06 pm

Is there any word on what pricing will be at the new registrar? For example are renewals at the same rate as for the registrar’s regular customers? Is there going to be an automatic addition of a year at the time of transfer and the associated charge.

Dave Zan 05.23.07 at 12:17 am

I just wonder if any of these guys at ICANN used Registerfly

One of their Board members did. He’s in the same boat as many of you are.

Maarten 05.23.07 at 12:28 am

Hi,

I’d appreciate it if ICANN could follow up closely on the transfers to ensure that owners of domains which have expired more than 30 days ago, but are still visibly listed as registered with Registerfly (and as such are currently ‘held’ by PIR) will be able to renew the domain with the new registrar.

Thanks.

cho0b 05.23.07 at 1:03 am

Only recently have a large portion of my domains disappeared from Registerfly. Since I was unable to renew my domains they expired and were eventually purged from my account. Will I retain ownership of these domains after the Registerfly registrar exchange? If not then I can say this process will not help most of the effected Registerfly users.

Andrew Staroscik 05.23.07 at 2:38 am

ICANN,

Thank you for the update. BUT, the question of expired domains has still not been directly addressed. What is going to happen to cho0b’s domains (and mine)?

joe somerville 05.23.07 at 4:27 am

their phone is disconnected —- i have lost at least 5 mjor web sites — http://www.visitharvard.com is just one of many -

will i be able to get these back -?

Andy Booths 05.23.07 at 5:30 am

Anyone who got caught up with RF knows the meaning of the word “annoying”. I’m glad iCANN is taking timely steps.

Erik Stensland 05.23.07 at 5:31 am

Thank you for the update! It is great to hear something, especially those of us who’s business has been hit hard. I have lots of questions, but I’ll wait for your next announcement as I imagine that it will be the new registrar that will handle many of these questions. Thanks again! I can’t imagine what would have happened if ICANN wasn’t here. The system is far from perfect, but it sure is a lot better than nothing!

Benji 05.23.07 at 8:56 am

I too like Andrew and cho0b have a domain that expired in all this mess and am also wondering what is going to happen to the expired domains?

I still see it in my registerfly account just in the expired domains section. Will these domains be retained and accessable after the transfer?

Thanks for all your help thus far ICANN!

Imhof Stefan (Swiss) 05.23.07 at 10:03 am

Also from me, I’m very thankfull for every information.
I have mine and 3 domains of customers from me registered at registerfly.
You can imagine: no Email no online catalogues…!
No happy customers on my side.

to the above: What ever registrar it will be, there must be a possibility to transfer to my prefered.

and a question:
I have in my account a domain that is expired and pending for delete since 3 months at Registerfly.
All personal informations on that as well as on the others are exchanged to registerfly credentials.
Will it still be possible to regain my domains?
Thanks

Imhof Stefan (Swiss) 05.23.07 at 10:11 am

Dear ICANN Team,
why don’t you just re-enable the feature that allows the user himself to transfer the domains where he want’s to transfer it?
Thanks

Senaia 05.23.07 at 12:43 pm

Well, all my domains are also expired in my regfly account, if the new registrar would take the domains and then drop it, then all this fuzz is useless for us. Anyway, I hope icann would not allow this and I also hope the new registrar would not charge us crazy amounts to get our domains back !

Gwen 05.23.07 at 1:08 pm

Well, one of my domains got rescued today - thankfully the one that had expired. E-mail from eNom said they could get it for me, just click here and create your account. According to the e-mail (copied below), I could then transfer my account to the registrar of my choice. Couldn’t find a way to do that, and I was sick of playing games, so I just renewed it with them. At least they let me renew it! Not perfect, but I have my domain back, almost instantaneously. Now for the rest of my domains that are being held hostage by Registerfly…

{message from eNom}

HOW TO SECURE CONTROL OF YOUR DOMAIN NAMES WITH ENOM:

Using the coded link below, create a free eNom login ID. There is no charge to open an eNom account. Once you do so, your eligible domain names will automatically be moved to the eNom control panel. There you can instantly re-access management rights for your domain names.

Click this link to create your free account and move your domains to eNom: {account specific link was here}

After you’ve created an eNom account, you will also have the option to transfer your domains to any other ICANN accredited registrar of your choice.

Sean Lee 05.23.07 at 1:17 pm

I have only 1 domain name expired - paid the money (US$12.00) but it was not renewed (when in Registerfly account), I have managed to transferred 4 domain out from Registerfly during the “troubled time”

I just receive email from Enom.com customer service to open a free account with them.

After opening the account , I found out that in order to renew my expired domain will cost me US$160.00

My domain is in Extended RGP now in Enom Account.

This price is really crazy, what I got to pay is way too much!

alan 05.23.07 at 3:52 pm

I managed to get all but 2 of my domains out of registerfly.

The ones transfered out still show in my registerfly account, so I hope the new registrar does not try to steal them back.

RAWHITE 05.23.07 at 5:10 pm

Will all of our Domains Transfer to the New registrar automatically?

Manex 05.23.07 at 8:30 pm

We really appreciate the news.

Sender 05.23.07 at 8:43 pm

Great!

Be sure to take your time with this. Let’s see the deal was announced last week and we were supposed to learn more then, now more vague details trickle out.

This is like watching a bad episode of “Lost” EXCEPT REAL PEOPLE ARE GETTING SCREWED. It’s not like this isn’t affecting our livelihoods or anything.

Someone, somewhere should be working 24/7 to make this “deal” happen.

mj 05.23.07 at 9:21 pm

I realize the majority of this is about domain names but what about those of us that had hosting through RF who’s intellectual property is being held hostage by RF and Sagonet.com in Florida??

mark 05.23.07 at 10:52 pm

one of my domain names with registerfly has now expired dispite them stealing the renewal fee from my credit card.
i am hearing more horror storys that eNom after offering a free account which gives them control of the domain names from registerfly, are charging $160.00! to renew $12.00 domain names!
what is going on???
is icann going to allow the bulk transfer of our domain names from registerfly to a company that will charge us $160.00 to renew expired domain names?

William 05.24.07 at 2:46 am

All I can say is that ICANN has been moving way to slow on this matter and are totally useless. After the dust has settled, I would support a petiton for ICANN to give control or control to be took by another enity (Like the EU).

JWade 05.24.07 at 6:40 am

I hope, now that RegisterFly is apparently delivering the data to another registrar, that ICANN doesn’t make a deal with their lawyers, to NOT proceed with their lawsuit, and Contempt of Court order. I wouldn’t be a bit surprised to hear later from ICANN that that has happened. I think it would be unusual if the Registerfly lawyers didn’t at least TRY to work something out, claiming that their client has done no wrong, and is demonstrating to be working in the best interests of it’s clients, when we all know this is not true. ICANN needs to show the internet community that it’s the users of the internet who need to be protected.

I’m disturbed that ICANN has considered this problem as simply a “contract” issue, and not a fraud issue. I believe that when the exchange of data has been made, that ICANN should bring in the FBI. You don’t need any special power to do that. You certainly have enough evidence to indicate fraud. I spent 8 years inside the IRS, and I can tell you that there are laws and procedures in place to protect the government’s interests immediately under “exigent circumstances.” ICANN needs to start developing complete procedures for handling this kind of crisis more expeditiously in the future. What if this situation occurs again overseas somewhere where you have many more obstacles to resolving the situation?

I would also expect you to have procedures in place for the new registrar to follow that protects all the rights of domain owners and web site owners who have been victimized by this mess. A lot of people have been expressing their concerns here, so there is certainly enough information for you to know what needs to be done. It would make me, and I sure everyone else, a lot more comfortable if I heard from ICANN that they were at least working on solving these issues.

“Registrar Abuse” needs to come to the forefront of ICANN’s policymakers.

Mike 05.24.07 at 8:37 am

To be honest I think we, the registrants of these domains held at RF should have a say as to which registrar takes control of them, I feel you should have let us vote say out of the top 5 or so registrars which submitted interest.

How was this secret registrar chosen, was it all about $?

I hope Net. Sol. isnt the winner…

Rick 05.24.07 at 9:05 am

ICANN has not yet got on top of the REGISTERFLY situation even though REGISTERFLY is supposed be accrediated by ICANN…

How can we now expect ICANN to repair the serious damage done to some 900,000 REGISTERFLY domain holders???

More important (as already noted), why are the details related to where my REGISTERFLY domains are going continuing to be secret???

I’m calling on ICANN to make this process transparent and detail everything happening so all can know exactly what is going on.

Erik Stensland 05.24.07 at 10:00 am

Perhaps we need to cool our approach and allow ICANN to work through this process. If I was the company taking on this problem I wouldn’t want the world to know until I had all the technical issues worked out and was ready to receive the thousands of questions from previous RegisterFly customers. I assume that ICANN is withholding this info from us so that the new registrar can get ready to handle the incredible demand that is about to hit them. We’ve also been informed in the ICANN post that they will allow us to transfer out to other registrars once the announcement is given.

I think we just need to calm down and let them work this out. I am a small business owner who has been badly hit by this, but I also know that all the railing against ICANN won’t help anything. We wish there was a magic wand to fix everything or that ICANN would have all the legal authority and manpower to fix it all right away but that is not realistic. Our US legal system is a mess and nothing happens quickly there. This is a big learning time for ICANN and the entire Internet community. Hopefully as a result of these problems the Internet will become a little safer place.

Natalie 05.24.07 at 10:16 am

We had a domain through RegisterFly, and when we went to renew it, our account was charged 3 times in total of 45 dollars–when the site gets transferred, will we have to pay a registration fee again, or will the registerfly payments still hold up?

Rick 05.24.07 at 11:01 am

Unfortunately, it seems ICANN was aware of problems with RegisterFly at least two years ago (that I can find - maybe longer) and did nothing. As you know ICANN has made two announcements so far that the situation is resolved and we have seen no actual action on the domains.

I’m not willing to allow more of my domain names to disappear just because ICANN states something is happening or they’re working on something. Having a transparent process would at least restore some confidence that the organization charged with safeguarding domain holders is really doing something.

Larry Seltzer 05.24.07 at 12:12 pm

Dear ICANN,

I see that Registerfly is once again offering domain name registrations on their web site.

How can this be? Is this part of their deal?

Sher 05.24.07 at 1:14 pm

Perhaps I’ve just been lucky, but I did find out how to find the Authorization Code for my domains at RegisterFly. I also was able to retrieve two expired domains so I could get those Auth Codes, too. And to complete the transfers, I had to change the admin contact e-mail that had been pointing to support@registerfly, so when the verifying e-mail comes, it’ll come to me and not them.

I only mention this because for several days I was really frustrated at not getting support tickets answered and believing I could not get the Auth Codes required. Network Solutions pointed me in the right direction to find the info and everything seems to be in process now. Just waiting for the WHOIS info to reflect my e-mail and the process will hopefully be able to be finalized.

The hints are: Auth Codes. When you’re managing a domain, open “Domain Contact Information.” Wait for the long list of info to come up, then click “Configure” at the very bottom. You’ll see bunches of boxes with contact info (change what you like, but the only necessary one for transfers is Admin e-mail). Just above the “Update” button at the bottom, over on the left, is the Authorization Code.

Expired Domain. I didn’t want to throw good money after bad, but it was worth it to me to try to get these domains active so I could, hopefully, get the Auth Codes. When you’re at the screen showing the expired domains, select all and then click “Modify.” Go from there.

Hope this helps someone else. Of course, all of this might be overtaken by events with the data moving elsewhere, but I just hate sitting around waiting.

REGISTERFLY RIP OFF 05.24.07 at 3:18 pm

ICANN already has one court order. Maybe a second permanent one tomorrow. How many court orders will it take for action to commence by ICANN?

Will Kevin Medina show?

US DISTRICT COURT, Central District
312 N. Spring Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRIDAY MAY 25, 2007 COURTROOM 8
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE MANUEL L. REAL, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
William Horrell Courtroom Deputy
Sheri Kleeger Court Reporter
Jeanine Wright David Malone Law Clerks
10:00 a.m. 1) CV-07-2089-R THE INTERNET CORP FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS -V-REGISTERFLY.COM et al
PROCEEDINGS:
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Further Contempt Sanctions
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why Permanent Injunction should not issue
Jeffrey Levee
Samantha Eisner

Sander J. Rabinowitz 05.24.07 at 6:48 pm

As of 22 May 2007, R’Fly continues to accept orders for new registrations, but continue in their failure to honor those orders. I base this on a test registration I attempted on the above date. Consistent with other reported experiences, the system would report a successful registration, deduct funds from the “Quick Pay” account, but would take no further action (and not even their own whois system operated properly). Needless to say, reports have been numerous with respect to dishonored renewals.

Not sure what conclusion to draw except that I don’t think the continued operation of the website is related to any deal that might be in the works. Frankly, R’Fly’s ongoing behavior can only serve to create further headaches for any acquiring registrar, since it’s forseeable that customers would expect ordered but unfulfilled domains to transfer over. –SJR

Sander J. Rabinowitz 05.24.07 at 6:58 pm

I asked about this a while back. The assurance that was received from ICANN was that if your domain is safely transferred out to another registrar, it’s not going to be transferred yet again. The scope of the transfer will not include domains that R’Fly “thinks” it has, but rather, those domains that are actually showing up in the public WHOIS as still registered under R’Fly. –SJR

Mark Emanuele 05.24.07 at 8:12 pm

Paul, what happens to a domain name that has been “Hijacked” by RF. orn.com has invalid whois info in it and I have had that name since the early 1990s the put some guy in Russia as the owner. The DNS is still set to my provider so my site still works. Once the new registrar takes over, my guess is that my domain name will be sold to the highest bidder. (The name never expired, the whois info was changed)

Mark Emanuele

Chris NIVARD 05.24.07 at 9:37 pm

1) Send an email to dummitlaw@gmail.com containing:
- this sentence “we would like to become a named plaintiff”.
- your personal information (name, address & phone number)
- your detailed loss amount.

2) Register to the mailing-list on:
http://www.registerfly-lawsuit.com

Chris NIVARD 05.24.07 at 9:41 pm

Thanks for this info!!

Imhof Stefan (Swiss) 05.24.07 at 9:47 pm

Dear Paul,
most of us have still access to their RF Account.
Why does ICANN not enable the RF-Site to transfer by the account holder.
So there must be no selection of any provider which fakes somehow the market, but there will be a normal spread over all existing providers in the world.
Why must someone make a decisson for so many others?
Thanks

Chris NIVARD 05.24.07 at 9:51 pm

I’m afraid you will have to pay again…

Call your credit card company and ask for a refund/chargeback for the $45 you’ve been charged for (explain that RF has gone bankrupt).

MarkMiller 05.24.07 at 11:52 pm

I have 6 Domains which are critical to our business expired on May 23rd. This is costing us a lot of money and what I dont understand is that how can RegisterFly be allowed to receive search traffic on my domains.

1) They do not let me transfer out the domains to another register, can not receive an authorization code.

2) I’ve been trying to transfer domain for 2-3 months, and now they expired and they have redirected domain traffic to there servers?

3) Who is the search partner? I believe we all should complain to the search partner that is paying out to register fly. They should be called out!

Please help to transfer over the domain registration information since we are lousing serious amounts of money. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP!

bigfoot 05.25.07 at 12:43 am

My understanding from ICANN announcements is that any receiving registrar will not be commercially the same but operated by an existing registrar. Also, that once domains are with them, extra years won’t be added so that renewal/transfer can be made to the registrar of your choice.

This does however leave those of us with expired domain names with a major cost problem. If other registrars expect the standard redemption busting fee (as Enom does currently) then 100 domans at $12 becomes 100 domains at $160. Even a moderate or small company would have to look at the cash flow implications of that unexpected expenditure.

Dave Zan 05.25.07 at 1:59 am

I’ll put it this way.

ICANN can certainly nuke their registrar accreditation if they haven’t done so already (sorry if I missed this detail). But they can’t force Registerfly to stop accepting domain registration orders as a reseller for another registrar unless they’re slapped with a Court order specifically banning such.

Unfortunately ICANN doesn’t exactly have any incentive to do this kind of action, more so if they themselves “can’t demonstrate they paid and weren’t delivered the goods as “promised”. Even so, they’ll still need to go to Court.

OTOH, ICANN isn’t really “required” to do this if numerous Registerfly clients had already forwarded their details to US law enforcement agencies. But I’m wondering why I haven’t seen any of them (like the FTC, for instance) served any Court notices to Registerfly themselves.

Larry Seltzer 05.25.07 at 2:41 am

What caught my attention was that they definitely had not been accepting new registrations for a while and lost the “ICANN Accredited” logo. The logo is still off, but they are taking registrations again.

bigfoot 05.25.07 at 2:55 am

RF aren’t actually succeeding in registrations - they appear to be taking the money, adding the domain name to the RF account but not doing the registrations.

If you read many posts this is reported by a lot of people.

Sher 05.25.07 at 4:23 am

Mark, see my complete post just above yours, but here’s the relevant part:

The hints are: Auth Codes. When you’re managing a domain, open “Domain Contact Information.” Wait for the long list of info to come up, then click “Configure” at the very bottom. You’ll see bunches of boxes with contact info (change what you like, but the only necessary one for transfers is Admin e-mail). Just above the “Update” button at the bottom, over on the left, is the Authorization Code.

Expired Domain. I didn’t want to throw good money after bad, but it was worth it to me to try to get these domains active so I could, hopefully, get the Auth Codes. When you’re at the screen showing the expired domains, select all and then click “Modify.” Go from there.

As soon as I respond to my new registrar’s verification e-mail, all my domains (some in the same situation as yours) will have been transferred away from RF. Finally!

The Gimme A Buck Guy 05.25.07 at 6:00 am

I don’t understand why ICANN is unable to just allow us to pick our own registrar to transfer out from registerfly?

What is the point of sending everyone to godaddy first?

Seems to me this is an ICANN “giveaway” to godaddy so Bob Parsons can brag even more about how wonderful he thinks he is. :(

Kamil Iskra 05.25.07 at 6:23 am

Much as I dislike ICANN’s slowness in this whole matter, I have to agree with their current course of action.

They can’t “just” allow us to transfer wherever we want on a per-domain basis, because in case of many domains, it cannot be easily established who the rightful owner is. Remember that RF has made it a habit to change people’s whois info to their own for no good reason.

It is thus quite reasonable that the domains be first transferred to an organization with resources capable of handling this mess domain-by-domain. Whether we like it or not, that’s GoDaddy.

M 05.25.07 at 6:30 am

Sher,

Help me understand, I should pay for the expired domains and then try to transfer even thought registerfly is not accredited. all my domains have expired, can you help me understand.

bigfoot 05.25.07 at 6:42 am

IF you try and pay at RFly you’ll probably loose your money. As it is very close (within 3 months - I’m not an optomistic person anymore) you should wait for GoDaddy or whoever is allocated the contract. Later today (or next week) we should be told what happened in court today (25th May 2007) and maybe have a better idea of what is likely to happen soon.

TheOne 05.25.07 at 9:19 am

Will all domain names be transfered? including regional domains like .be domain names to the new registrar?

Josjo 05.25.07 at 9:53 am

I have moved out about 14 domains succesfully, had to pay Regfly so I could get to the auth codes because most had just expired.

Then I had to pay again at my new registrar to get them moved.
Fortunatelly the moving went smooth and pretty fast.

So please don’t make me loose or pay a third time for my succesfully moved out domains… Four of those domains show active in my Regfly account, fortunatelly Whois is showing my new registrar.

A couple of .info and .com domains would not renew, some locked error.. So these are still in my Regfly’s expired list. I hope we will be able to keep and renew such domains. I would need standard or lower prices and extra time to make that possible.

Sher 05.25.07 at 10:19 am

M,

All I can say is that’s what I did. Immediately when I paid, I was able to see the Authorization Code, which I couldn’t get to when the domains were in an expired status. With that info, I could initiate the transfer with a new registrar. If you go this route, remember to also change the Admin e-mail to be yours, if it isn’t already, because the new registrar will send an email to that address to verify you approve the transfer.

I don’t know what the “real” expiration date will end up being, but for the two domains that just expired, I thought $17.98 was a small price to pay to not have to switch everything over to a new url. bigfoot may be right to cousel waiting until the new registrar takes over, but since this has already dragged on so long, I wasn’t content to wait for something that may or may not happen in the near or far future. Good luck whichever path you choose!

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 10:47 am

Mark

It depends if the name was actually hijacked or if in fact it was some other problem. But it is the new registrar’s job to assist you.

Paul

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 10:49 am

This is a common problem. It is an issue for a new registrar to assist you with.

Paul

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 10:54 am

Any bulk transfer will not assist in retrieving monies owed to you by RegisterFly.

Our contract simply doesn’t provide us with the power to force refunds.

This could be part of a discussion about the revised registrar accreditation agreements.

You might seek legal advice of you believe that money has been taken from you under false pretences.

Paul

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 11:00 am

JWade

a transfer would only transfer names registered at RFly not some other organisation.

You should approach enom direct: Customersupport@enom.com

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 11:01 am

That’s an issue for any new registrar

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 11:02 am

All names currently registered with RegisterFly will be transferred regardless of status.

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 11:03 am

Cho0b

Yes expired names will be transferred as well.

Paul

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 11:04 am

Thanks Andy

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 11:04 am

Thanks Erik

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 11:05 am

See above - expired names will be transferred

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 11:07 am

Swiss

If you are referring to obtaining auth-codes, it was put in place to ensure better security for registrants

Paul

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 11:09 am

We are working to do all we can in the circumstances to assist registrants. We completely understand how painful this has been for you. We are pursuing RegisterFly with all our capacity.

Paul

M 05.25.07 at 11:10 am

Sher,

Thank you! I will try it and let you know!

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 11:12 am

ICANN does not have a role in advising or coordinating hosting.

Whether RegisterFly continues as a provider and whether people wish to give them their custom is entirely a matter for them.

paul

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 11:14 am

If you think there are issues of fraud here then you should refer it the authorities

Paul

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 11:17 am

bigfoot

What;s being spoken of here is a commercial transaction between Rfly and an accredited registrar. It is not the nominated ‘transfer provider’ process commenced by ICANN two weeks ago.

paul

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 11:20 am

Erick

Thanks.. That is a balanced view point. This has been incredibly frustrating for all concerned but particularly registrants. we have tried through forums like this to be transparent and engage in dialogue and we have provided as much information and advice as we can without jeopardising legal options and business concerns.

paul

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 11:22 am

Larry

They are in violation of a court order in relation this. The Court has told them to put up a prominent disclaimer alerting customers to the pending termination of RegisterFly on their website.

Please feel free to tell anyone you can. We’ll do all we can to pass this on.

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 11:23 am

Kevin Medina did show.

There will be an update on this blog soon.

Paul Levins 05.25.07 at 11:29 am

Not sure abt country codes. We don’t have any power to control the management of country code domains. All other domains will be transferred

WebGuru 05.25.07 at 1:04 pm

MY QUESTION TO

I

C

A

N

N

Is this:

I just had more names be moved over to Enom from Registerfly. This is the 5th time. The last time I just sent them the list of my names and they went through and managed to get 70+ out. They said that was it.

Last Friday, I got an email saying 8 more were found to be in my name and were being pushed into my account at Enom. NOW, these names are expired ones. They want $50.00 for 6 of them and $150.00 for the other 2.

When I called, they said I could either pay it, or they will be released.

They say they can not avoid these charges.

I say ICANN has the authority to make Enom let us renew our names at a reasonable price. Instead of letting Enom EXTORT this money out of us and make the situation worse.

My question is, why is ICANN allowing this to go on?

Simple question. Do you think you can answer it? (Thats 2 questions, I know)

Mike 05.25.07 at 2:03 pm

I’m sure that by the time ICANN does resolve this issue my name will be in RDP as well, I best not have to pay the $100+ RDP fee to get my name back when I was perfectly willing, yet unable to renew it for $8 tks to RF…

Dave Zan 05.25.07 at 8:24 pm

I say ICANN has the authority to make Enom let us renew our names at a reasonable price.

Such a conclusion is easy to reach if one doesn’t care to read and understand the agreements reached in the first place. ICANN has no authority to dictate to registrars how much they “should” charge their customers for, and neither will the registrars appreciate them imposing such.

Would you like someone to impose their will on you, especially if it’s for something neither of you agreed to in the beginning?

WebGuru 05.26.07 at 7:23 am

Well then if that is the case, WHY IS THERE AN ICANN if you have no powers. That is what it sounds like.

Just another Gov. group that loves to take vacations and money.

Again, just what is your purpose?

Your useless.

Its took 2 years ansd still nothing.

Money is being extorted, fraud is still being allowed to happen.

This is good reason for another enity to assume control of ICANN.

Bill Edwards 05.29.07 at 8:32 pm

Just like the pizza guy. Thank you. Thank you. This is great news.

Autoresponder Letters

Grandpa 05.31.07 at 5:47 pm

First they say that domains will be transferred to “an existing accredited Registrar with a demonstrated record of customer service”, and then they announce that they apparently have changed their minds and transferred them to Go Daddy.

The same people who hire telephone staff who don’t know the first thing about the business and who, once they have your credit card number, make charges to it at their leisure.

Thanks a lot, ICANN!

How can I get my domains transferred to a legitimate registrar?

Jack Durban 11.10.07 at 11:09 am

Godaddy should not be considered as they have a serious security problem. Someone there stole one of our most valuable domains. We can’t figure out how they did it but godaddy is complicit in their failure to provide a simple verification email to us to confirm or deny the transfer. It was quite simple for the thief but not so easy to get it back. It will cost us thousands to get it back. Godaddy basically told us to go pound sand. To get this back we have to file a cease and desist letter through an attorney. Then after a predetermined period of time if the crook fails to comply then we have to file a formal action with ICANN or better put “ICANNT” and give them $1,500.00 to impanel a board of arbitrators!
Total bill with all legal fees could reach several thousand dollars.
I got hosed by godaddy and Bob Parsons didn’t even send me flowers.

This method of recovering stolen domains is counter-intuitive and needs to be transferred to the courts.

$1,500.00 to recover an obviously stolen domain is itself a crime. Simple cases should be handled like a simple case like small claims court in the U.S.

ICANN might as well just advertise “sorry we only protect the interests of large corporations and the wealthy”.

The 9-5 type of guy gets the shaft.

Kieren McCarthy 11.10.07 at 5:41 pm

There’s a lot of allegations here Jack but precious few facts.

If you believe GoDaddy has broken the terms of its agreement with ICANN, please email us at registry [at] ICANN [dot] org giving further details and we will look into it.

If you think the system itself is wrong, please turn up at the next ICANN meeting and say so. We have just closed a public comment period on reform to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (http://www.icann.org/public_comment/#raa-consultation) and just had a public meeting about changes at our recent ICANN meetings.

But I’m pretty sure there will be another public comment period where you opinions will be counted.

If you have specific questions about how you can get involved, or what the best method is, please post here or email me direct.

Kieren

Jack Durban 12.19.07 at 6:02 am

Light on facts? I have an entire paper trail between Godaddy and myself showing exactly what happened. The FACT is that ICANN is a useless organization that only stands in the way of protecting owners of domains. Your outlandish fees and lack of common sense practical solutions to problems like mine only highlights why your organization needs to be absorbed by a real organization actually interested in protecting the rights of those who expect some form of protection against theft of property. If you guys ran world war 2 the world would be speaking German.

And why would I pay to fly out there to participate in an organization that is no more powerful than a homeowner association?

You are completely useless and ineffective and should be disbanded to make way for a real and viable solution to domain theft!

Jack Durban,

Victim of domain theft and the ineptness of ICANN

Kieren McCarthy 12.21.07 at 1:00 pm

Hello Jack

I am afraid that ICANN’s bylaws prohibit the organisation from running any wars, especially historical ones.

However we are working on an extensive translation program which, if the demand is sufficiently high, may make some of our materials available in German.

Thank you again for your reasoned and insightful comments. We wish you all the best in your future endeavors.

Kieren McCarthy
General manager of public participation, ICANN

Francis 12.28.07 at 5:19 am

The gentleman has a point. You are, as an organization, of little value and utility unless the complainant is a large corporation with deep pockets. The illegal theft of domains is a growing problem and icann is not equipped to deal with the issue. Your insensitive bureaucratic responses to inquiries is further evidence that icann is indifferent to this issue and should indeed be dismantled and replaced by regional authorities.

Your rather juvenile response is troubling.

Comments on this entry are closed.