<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So&#8230; how are we doing? Let&#8217;s hear what you have to say about ICANN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.icann.org/2007/05/so-how-are-we-doing-lets-hear-what-you-have-to-say-about-icann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.icann.org/2007/05/so-how-are-we-doing-lets-hear-what-you-have-to-say-about-icann/</link>
	<description>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:42:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieren McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2007/05/so-how-are-we-doing-lets-hear-what-you-have-to-say-about-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-2013</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieren McCarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 08:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=125#comment-2013</guid>
		<description>The reason why your comment was deleted - and the repost of it will also be edited is because it infringed our comment policy, namely:

&quot;Relevance

We would also like to stress that comments covering an entirely different topic to the actual blog post they are attached to are also frowned upon. If it is a mistake, we have no problem, but the ICANN blog is there to be a reasonable and helpful communication and interaction tool - not to lobby by the backdoor, or harangue staff over the same issue out of context.&quot;

This blog post asks people a number of clear questions, none of which you have attempted to answer but instead choose to claim that the RegisterFly issue meant that the best option was &quot;political reform&quot; of ICANN - whatever that means.

You also claimed that ICANN staff are repeatedly putting the phone down on you. There is one persistent poster on this blog that makes this claim frequently in the full knowledge that it isn&#039;t true.

So: your post is in the wrong place, is unclear and makes an unsubstantiated allegation. For that reason we have edited it. Feel free to write whatever you like on other messageboards on the Internet, or to write a more normal response which we then happily retain on this blog.


Kieren McCarthy
General manager of public participation, ICANN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason why your comment was deleted &#8211; and the repost of it will also be edited is because it infringed our comment policy, namely:</p>
<p>&#8220;Relevance</p>
<p>We would also like to stress that comments covering an entirely different topic to the actual blog post they are attached to are also frowned upon. If it is a mistake, we have no problem, but the ICANN blog is there to be a reasonable and helpful communication and interaction tool &#8211; not to lobby by the backdoor, or harangue staff over the same issue out of context.&#8221;</p>
<p>This blog post asks people a number of clear questions, none of which you have attempted to answer but instead choose to claim that the RegisterFly issue meant that the best option was &#8220;political reform&#8221; of ICANN &#8211; whatever that means.</p>
<p>You also claimed that ICANN staff are repeatedly putting the phone down on you. There is one persistent poster on this blog that makes this claim frequently in the full knowledge that it isn&#8217;t true.</p>
<p>So: your post is in the wrong place, is unclear and makes an unsubstantiated allegation. For that reason we have edited it. Feel free to write whatever you like on other messageboards on the Internet, or to write a more normal response which we then happily retain on this blog.</p>
<p>Kieren McCarthy<br />
General manager of public participation, ICANN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Holder</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2007/05/so-how-are-we-doing-lets-hear-what-you-have-to-say-about-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-2008</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Holder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 04:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=125#comment-2008</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Posted this comment earlier and it was deleted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why does ICANN ask for comments and then delete???&lt;/p&gt;
[post edited - see comment below for explanation]
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted this comment earlier and it was deleted.</p>
<p>Why does ICANN ask for comments and then delete???</p>
<p>[post edited - see comment below for explanation]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2007/05/so-how-are-we-doing-lets-hear-what-you-have-to-say-about-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-1839</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 17:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=125#comment-1839</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read all of the B.S. reasonings behind awarding Verisign the contract and again pardon me for bringing G.W.B into the thread but like in his ideal world, your way of stability is nothing but B.S.  While I have my facts my math was a little off and what I meant to say was that your &quot;value added tax&quot; of .22 (and thanks for the .03 refund) is 7x the cost of doing business for Verisign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read all of the B.S. reasonings behind awarding Verisign the contract and again pardon me for bringing G.W.B into the thread but like in his ideal world, your way of stability is nothing but B.S.  While I have my facts my math was a little off and what I meant to say was that your &#8220;value added tax&#8221; of .22 (and thanks for the .03 refund) is 7x the cost of doing business for Verisign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veni Markovski</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2007/05/so-how-are-we-doing-lets-hear-what-you-have-to-say-about-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-1753</link>
		<dc:creator>Veni Markovski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 22:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=125#comment-1753</guid>
		<description>John,
you can find the answers to some of your these questions at ttp://www.icann.org/topics/vrsn-settlement/board-statements-section2.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br />
you can find the answers to some of your these questions at ttp://www.icann.org/topics/vrsn-settlement/board-statements-section2.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2007/05/so-how-are-we-doing-lets-hear-what-you-have-to-say-about-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-1722</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 20:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=125#comment-1722</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s about time for an official way to do private registrations.  It shouldn&#039;t cost extra to shield yourself from electronic and paper junk mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s about time for an official way to do private registrations.  It shouldn&#8217;t cost extra to shield yourself from electronic and paper junk mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jagdip</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2007/05/so-how-are-we-doing-lets-hear-what-you-have-to-say-about-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-1721</link>
		<dc:creator>Jagdip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 19:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=125#comment-1721</guid>
		<description>ICANN lays down the rules, they are for better but the registrars openly put the rules in a box with their own terms and conditions!

I very well understand that the grace period is the choice and decision of the registrar and they may or may not give to the registrant.

Redemption period is given (by the registry) just to make sure that the existing registrar gets enough time and chance to get back his domain if he fails to renew it in time. Registrars are intelligent enough to put in their terms that they may not give this option to the customer. 

The domains are simply sold of (with the existing registration date) after the expiry of the domain in the name of &#039;backorders&#039;. The customer is helpless! Yes it is his responsibility to renew the domain in time but it is his right to get the redemption period if not the free grace period.

I would request ICANN to read the terms of various registrars and see if they really follow the terms laid down for them? 


Some interesting lines from a well known &quot;back order&quot; company.

SnapNames continues to add members of this elite registrar group to its Priority Partner program, which now includes Network Solutions, Dotster, Register.com, DotRegistrar, DomainPeople, Moniker, DirectNIC and others. These partners offer their expired domains through SnapNames before they are available anywhere else in the public market, giving SnapNames customers exclusive access to some of the highest value--and best priced--domain names on the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ICANN lays down the rules, they are for better but the registrars openly put the rules in a box with their own terms and conditions!</p>
<p>I very well understand that the grace period is the choice and decision of the registrar and they may or may not give to the registrant.</p>
<p>Redemption period is given (by the registry) just to make sure that the existing registrar gets enough time and chance to get back his domain if he fails to renew it in time. Registrars are intelligent enough to put in their terms that they may not give this option to the customer. </p>
<p>The domains are simply sold of (with the existing registration date) after the expiry of the domain in the name of &#8216;backorders&#8217;. The customer is helpless! Yes it is his responsibility to renew the domain in time but it is his right to get the redemption period if not the free grace period.</p>
<p>I would request ICANN to read the terms of various registrars and see if they really follow the terms laid down for them? </p>
<p>Some interesting lines from a well known &#8220;back order&#8221; company.</p>
<p>SnapNames continues to add members of this elite registrar group to its Priority Partner program, which now includes Network Solutions, Dotster, Register.com, DotRegistrar, DomainPeople, Moniker, DirectNIC and others. These partners offer their expired domains through SnapNames before they are available anywhere else in the public market, giving SnapNames customers exclusive access to some of the highest value&#8211;and best priced&#8211;domain names on the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2007/05/so-how-are-we-doing-lets-hear-what-you-have-to-say-about-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 18:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=125#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>Only a person associated with ICANN could see any similarities between themselves and Hitler. 

I don;t think I will get anything but a beat around the bush answer on the questions I&#039;m going to ask but here they go anyway.

If you really think you have improved over the past few years then why did you award Verisign a limitless contract on .com and .net tld&#039;s with price increases when other stable organizations said they could and would do it cheaper. It&#039;s been broken down and the estimated costs to run the registry on .com is figured at $.03 per domain. The price increase expected of 7% is 6x the cost of doing business. The 7% increase alone is only 1/5 of what other companies said they would do it for.  So tell me how it&#039;s beneficial to me as a consumer that the organization who is suppose to be working in my favor grants a corporation more of my money and doesn&#039;t give me any better service for said money. I&#039;m suppose to think you&#039;re doing a good job? Give me a break.. 


As far as the Registerfly debacle. You have shown that your jobs are pretty much useless. You had to get a court order to do your job. So please explain to me what exactly it is that you do there? That is outside of flying around the world having quarterly meeting at exotic locations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only a person associated with ICANN could see any similarities between themselves and Hitler. </p>
<p>I don;t think I will get anything but a beat around the bush answer on the questions I&#8217;m going to ask but here they go anyway.</p>
<p>If you really think you have improved over the past few years then why did you award Verisign a limitless contract on .com and .net tld&#8217;s with price increases when other stable organizations said they could and would do it cheaper. It&#8217;s been broken down and the estimated costs to run the registry on .com is figured at $.03 per domain. The price increase expected of 7% is 6x the cost of doing business. The 7% increase alone is only 1/5 of what other companies said they would do it for.  So tell me how it&#8217;s beneficial to me as a consumer that the organization who is suppose to be working in my favor grants a corporation more of my money and doesn&#8217;t give me any better service for said money. I&#8217;m suppose to think you&#8217;re doing a good job? Give me a break.. </p>
<p>As far as the Registerfly debacle. You have shown that your jobs are pretty much useless. You had to get a court order to do your job. So please explain to me what exactly it is that you do there? That is outside of flying around the world having quarterly meeting at exotic locations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2007/05/so-how-are-we-doing-lets-hear-what-you-have-to-say-about-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-1717</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 18:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=125#comment-1717</guid>
		<description>I believe ICANN is doing a good job, although things can always be improve. What needs to change is there needs to be more organization on what is going on and a lot &lt;strong&gt;more communication&lt;/strong&gt; on what you are doing. Get the word out more on what you have done for the Internet community and what you are continuing to do and what your working on. 
By letting us know those things the public will have a much higher affinity for your organization. In fact, it&#039;s rather simple and it will make a great impact. 
Let me know if I can be of any help to you. 
Thanks for all your work, 
Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe ICANN is doing a good job, although things can always be improve. What needs to change is there needs to be more organization on what is going on and a lot <strong>more communication</strong> on what you are doing. Get the word out more on what you have done for the Internet community and what you are continuing to do and what your working on.<br />
By letting us know those things the public will have a much higher affinity for your organization. In fact, it&#8217;s rather simple and it will make a great impact.<br />
Let me know if I can be of any help to you.<br />
Thanks for all your work,<br />
Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieren McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2007/05/so-how-are-we-doing-lets-hear-what-you-have-to-say-about-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-1703</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieren McCarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 18:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=125#comment-1703</guid>
		<description>I think we can hear the quiet rumblings of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin&#039;s_Law&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Godwin&#039;s Law&lt;/a&gt; inevitably and risibly heading in the direction of this post.


Kieren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we can hear the quiet rumblings of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_Law" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Godwin&#8217;s Law</a> inevitably and risibly heading in the direction of this post.</p>
<p>Kieren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2007/05/so-how-are-we-doing-lets-hear-what-you-have-to-say-about-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-1702</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 18:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=125#comment-1702</guid>
		<description>This is like Bush asking US citizens how he is doing in his war on terror. Like him you should all be fired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is like Bush asking US citizens how he is doing in his war on terror. Like him you should all be fired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

