Comments on: Do you believe in Transition? http://blog.icann.org/2008/01/do-you-believe-in-transition/ Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:20:28 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: ROYTUCKER http://blog.icann.org/2008/01/do-you-believe-in-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-12484 ROYTUCKER Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:00:58 +0000 http://blog.icann.org/?p=262#comment-12484 have a question. I have read most of the great pages the people have assembled and i compliment the fine work. I found a domain that was owned by a man that has passed on. died. and i contacted the registration site, (DomainShack.com) and have not heard back but in the last hour the site has been moved (on the whois) to Internic. And it still shows the site is taken, but i thought the rules stated that the previous owner would be removed and the site would be available. IS this the NEW INTERNET, where these domain registers do not have to pay for names but they can just hold them until someone wants them bad enough or has $200.00 in spare change to buy a name that is and has not ever been associated with an actual web page under its own name. This seems total contrary to the philosophy and feeling that existed many many i guess many many years ago. And the philosophy I felt reading the ICANN charter. Now I would like to know how one gets set up to become the main place where names get sent when either the owner fails to keep up his WHOIS or for whatever reason. Seems to me a bit jilted. And more honorable to give a name that is retired to the person that investigated the whois and filed a report with the register of that domain name. But alas the same type of dishonorable business exists, which is what I thought the ICANN was formed to absolve such dealings of arranged name grabbing. Would not the person who discovers a bad whois deserve at least a chance even if only a small chance to gain the name of so many hours research. How do I just get control of a name that is not even on my site and with the ability to own that name without paying for ifs registry and wit the authority to sell such names for $200.00. Seems like a professional ring of dishonorable business people. Nothing remotely fair about how they make their money. May karma be gentle to them and not shower upon them all that they deserve. Roy Tucker 510-475-0444 Looks a little dirty around here. I do feel ICANN should collect from these sites payment for possession just like we get charged. They are indeed using them just like we are. I believe ICANN needs to address this issue. Sounds like a conspiracy to commit theft and a whee bit of extortion. maybe racketeering laws would cover this. Sure kind fits the same kind of situations that the gangs or even mafia used. NO CHANCE OF OUTSIDE SALES and control of the product with obnoxiously high prices. Wow I think this situation fulfills the conditions for extortion. But alas I am just a peroson who took law classes 20 plus years ago. And I am with a BA in LAW but truly now not that the words typed here mean anything but taking up space and a few bytes on the internet. (((HUGS))) Roy have a question. I have read most of the great pages the people have assembled and i compliment the fine work. I found a domain that was owned by a man that has passed on. died. and i contacted the registration site, (DomainShack.com) and have not heard back but in the last hour the site has been moved (on the whois) to Internic. And it still shows the site is taken, but i thought the rules stated that the previous owner would be removed and the site would be available. IS this the NEW INTERNET, where these domain registers do not have to pay for names but they can just hold them until someone wants them bad enough or has $200.00 in spare change to buy a name that is and has not ever been associated with an actual web page under its own name. This seems total contrary to the philosophy and feeling that existed many many i guess many many years ago. And the philosophy I felt reading the ICANN charter. Now I would like to know how one gets set up to become the main place where names get sent when either the owner fails to keep up his WHOIS or for whatever reason. Seems to me a bit jilted. And more honorable to give a name that is retired to the person that investigated the whois and filed a report with the register of that domain name. But alas the same type of dishonorable business exists, which is what I thought the ICANN was formed to absolve such dealings of arranged name grabbing. Would not the person who discovers a bad whois deserve at least a chance even if only a small chance to gain the name of so many hours research. How do I just get control of a name that is not even on my site and with the ability to own that name without paying for ifs registry and wit the authority to sell such names for $200.00. Seems like a professional ring of dishonorable business people. Nothing remotely fair about how they make their money. May karma be gentle to them and not shower upon them all that they deserve. Roy Tucker 510-475-0444 Looks a little dirty around here. I do feel ICANN should collect from these sites payment for possession just like we get charged. They are indeed using them just like we are. I believe ICANN needs to address this issue. Sounds like a conspiracy to commit theft and a whee bit of extortion. maybe racketeering laws would cover this. Sure kind fits the same kind of situations that the gangs or even mafia used. NO CHANCE OF OUTSIDE SALES and control of the product with obnoxiously high prices. Wow I think this situation fulfills the conditions for extortion. But alas I am just a peroson who took law classes 20 plus years ago. And I am with a BA in LAW but truly now not that the words typed here mean anything but taking up space and a few bytes on the internet. (((HUGS))) Roy

]]> By: 贵阳酒店 http://blog.icann.org/2008/01/do-you-believe-in-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-11098 贵阳酒店 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 10:13:35 +0000 http://blog.icann.org/?p=262#comment-11098 yes i do believe in Transition, happy birthday of ICANN blog yes i do believe in Transition, happy birthday of ICANN blog

]]> By: Kaydırıcı Kremler http://blog.icann.org/2008/01/do-you-believe-in-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-9698 Kaydırıcı Kremler Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:17:48 +0000 http://blog.icann.org/?p=262#comment-9698 Kaydırıcı Kremler www.seksuel.com Erotik Seks Shop Sex Market Cinsel Sağlık Ürünleri azdırıcı uyarıcı penis büyütücü geciktirici ilaçlar erotik alışveriş hap damla krem sprey parfüm vibratör Kaydırıcı Kremler
http://www.seksuel.com Erotik Seks Shop Sex Market Cinsel Sağlık Ürünleri azdırıcı uyarıcı penis büyütücü geciktirici ilaçlar erotik alışveriş hap damla krem sprey parfüm vibratör

]]> By: Domaining - Information on Domains and Domaining » Comment on Do you believe in Transition? by Jeremie Grandmaitre http://blog.icann.org/2008/01/do-you-believe-in-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-9548 Domaining - Information on Domains and Domaining » Comment on Do you believe in Transition? by Jeremie Grandmaitre Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:20:58 +0000 http://blog.icann.org/?p=262#comment-9548 [...] on Do you believe in Transition? by Jeremie Grandmaitre Scott Clark wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptAfter all Domain Registration is a [...] [...] on Do you believe in Transition? by Jeremie Grandmaitre Scott Clark wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptAfter all Domain Registration is a [...]

]]> By: Anonymous http://blog.icann.org/2008/01/do-you-believe-in-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-9490 Anonymous Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:06:29 +0000 http://blog.icann.org/?p=262#comment-9490 f- f-

]]> By: Jeremie Grandmaitre http://blog.icann.org/2008/01/do-you-believe-in-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-9456 Jeremie Grandmaitre Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:26:41 +0000 http://blog.icann.org/?p=262#comment-9456 I truly believe that society and the world abroad is benefiting from what ICANN has accomplished thus far. I feel that the Next Step of Transition should greatly focus on Security. I was recently the victim of Identity Theft which lead to someone registering a domain name with some of my Information and utilizing my full name as the domain name. This was done maliciously and they subsequently impersonated me, by creating a Blog online to defame my character. A violation of the UDRP - Sections 2 - (b), (c), (d). As well a clear violation of several Laws in my country (Canada). It has been a real battle ever since, and in this Case the Registrar is Yahoo Small Business. The focus of the UDRP seems to be on "trademark or service mark", what happened to protecting individuals? In Canada what this individual or individual(s) is doing; has done are Canadian Criminal Offences. Even if in the end, which I expect to see occur shortly. The domain name is suspended and taken away from this user. Why should he protected by Common Privacy Policies? The ironic part is that he has violated my Private Information under our Canadian Privacy Act. What about obtaining once I prove my Identity the information that I require to ensure that my local law enforcement can prosecute this individual. I truly feel that Security, Promptness to Resolve Security Issues with some Registrars and Ethics seems to be lacking. After all Domain Registration is a key factor on a Global Internet Scale; Control has to be maintained, since Domain Names are on of the forth most important element on today's Internet. These are my comments, and if you know where I can turn to get additional help with my problem. I would greatly appreciate it. Jeremie Grandmaitre I truly believe that society and the world abroad is benefiting from what
ICANN has accomplished thus far.

I feel that the Next Step of Transition should greatly focus on Security. I was recently the victim of Identity Theft which lead to someone registering a domain name with some of my Information and utilizing my full name as the domain name. This was done maliciously and they subsequently impersonated me, by creating a Blog online to defame my character.

A violation of the UDRP – Sections 2 – (b), (c), (d). As well a clear violation of several Laws in my country (Canada). It has been a real battle ever since, and in this Case the Registrar is Yahoo Small Business.

The focus of the UDRP seems to be on “trademark or service mark”, what happened to protecting individuals? In Canada what this individual or individual(s) is doing; has done are Canadian Criminal Offences.

Even if in the end, which I expect to see occur shortly. The domain name is suspended and taken away from this user. Why should he protected by Common Privacy Policies? The ironic part is that he has violated my Private Information under our Canadian Privacy Act. What about obtaining once I prove my Identity the information that I require to ensure that my local law enforcement can prosecute this individual.

I truly feel that Security, Promptness to Resolve Security Issues with some Registrars and Ethics seems to be lacking. After all Domain Registration is a key factor on a Global Internet Scale; Control has to be maintained, since Domain Names are on of the forth most important element on today’s Internet.

These are my comments, and if you know where I can turn to get additional help with my problem. I would greatly appreciate it.

Jeremie Grandmaitre

]]> By: McFly http://blog.icann.org/2008/01/do-you-believe-in-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-9449 McFly Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:09:19 +0000 http://blog.icann.org/?p=262#comment-9449 ¿What relation have the ICANN and the IANA with the INAIC? ¿What relation have the ICANN and the IANA with the INAIC?

]]> By: Kieren McCarthy http://blog.icann.org/2008/01/do-you-believe-in-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-9428 Kieren McCarthy Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:10:44 +0000 http://blog.icann.org/?p=262#comment-9428 Hi Elisabeth, Yes, sorry about that. It has now been fixed. Kieren Hi Elisabeth,

Yes, sorry about that. It has now been fixed.

Kieren

]]> By: Elisabeth Porteneuve http://blog.icann.org/2008/01/do-you-believe-in-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-9418 Elisabeth Porteneuve Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:45:28 +0000 http://blog.icann.org/?p=262#comment-9418 The URLs on the ICANN's main page related to the JPA answers are password protected The URLs on the ICANN’s main page related to the JPA answers are password protected

]]>