<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: May magazine out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.icann.org/2008/05/may-magazine-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.icann.org/2008/05/may-magazine-out/</link>
	<description>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:20:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2008/05/may-magazine-out/comment-page-1/#comment-14570</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=311#comment-14570</guid>
		<description>Anti-spam word is life.. lol

&quot;The Board today accepted a recommendation from its global stakeholders that it is possible to implement many new names to the Internet, paving the way for an expansion of domain name choice and opportunity&quot; 

Is this for someones mates in Old Media syndicates that already own the best names, and will no doubt own the next set. While they currently make claim that all Internet not owned by Old Media is Evil and run by Spammers.  Ever had it printed that your a Spammer without a conviction?

Couldn&#039;t help but notice how the Stakeholders remain nameless?!?
(or is this a list filled with ideals - domain owners, for and against)

So where is MY refund for the current marketing by &#039;Stakeholders&#039; that claims ownership of a domain name that is currently required by anyone but the Stakeholders who by money will claim right to express and claim choice as they currently do with every landrush...

Oh, dibs on .pages and .page

While you charge for another system - why not move existing domains with the same spelling to the new system??? 

lol (I bet the old media cash cheque has already been sent to Icann)

Nice book, will collect a copy the next time i can find the money (will get that from saving on not registering with ICANN useless moneyless domains)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anti-spam word is life.. lol</p>
<p>&#8220;The Board today accepted a recommendation from its global stakeholders that it is possible to implement many new names to the Internet, paving the way for an expansion of domain name choice and opportunity&#8221; </p>
<p>Is this for someones mates in Old Media syndicates that already own the best names, and will no doubt own the next set. While they currently make claim that all Internet not owned by Old Media is Evil and run by Spammers.  Ever had it printed that your a Spammer without a conviction?</p>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t help but notice how the Stakeholders remain nameless?!?<br />
(or is this a list filled with ideals &#8211; domain owners, for and against)</p>
<p>So where is MY refund for the current marketing by &#8216;Stakeholders&#8217; that claims ownership of a domain name that is currently required by anyone but the Stakeholders who by money will claim right to express and claim choice as they currently do with every landrush&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh, dibs on .pages and .page</p>
<p>While you charge for another system &#8211; why not move existing domains with the same spelling to the new system??? </p>
<p>lol (I bet the old media cash cheque has already been sent to Icann)</p>
<p>Nice book, will collect a copy the next time i can find the money (will get that from saving on not registering with ICANN useless moneyless domains)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: publicidad en internet</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2008/05/may-magazine-out/comment-page-1/#comment-14551</link>
		<dc:creator>publicidad en internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 05:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=311#comment-14551</guid>
		<description>A monthly basis is good and full of interesting articles.
What about the new TLD domains, .love &amp; .paris?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A monthly basis is good and full of interesting articles.<br />
What about the new TLD domains, .love &amp; .paris?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
