<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which region is taking the lead in IPv6 deployment?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.icann.org/2008/09/which-region-is-taking-the-lead-in-ipv6-deployment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.icann.org/2008/09/which-region-is-taking-the-lead-in-ipv6-deployment/</link>
	<description>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:20:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Easter</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2008/09/which-region-is-taking-the-lead-in-ipv6-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-19263</link>
		<dc:creator>Easter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=365#comment-19263</guid>
		<description>The IPv6 Summit offers two days of international and Australian experts, plus an optional one-day IPv6 Deployment Workshop to provide a hands-on guide to implementation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IPv6 Summit offers two days of international and Australian experts, plus an optional one-day IPv6 Deployment Workshop to provide a hands-on guide to implementation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Кирпичный блог &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Строится!Game Over</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2008/09/which-region-is-taking-the-lead-in-ipv6-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-15134</link>
		<dc:creator>Кирпичный блог &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Строится!Game Over</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=365#comment-15134</guid>
		<description>[...] Which region is taking the lead in IPv6 deployment? IPv6 is in the news because the mainstream media have started to pick up the fact that IPv4 will be fully allocated in the next two or three years. And IPv6 deployment is important if we want to keep [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Which region is taking the lead in IPv6 deployment? IPv6 is in the news because the mainstream media have started to pick up the fact that IPv4 will be fully allocated in the next two or three years. And IPv6 deployment is important if we want to keep [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buyvend.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2008/09/which-region-is-taking-the-lead-in-ipv6-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-15090</link>
		<dc:creator>buyvend.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=365#comment-15090</guid>
		<description>people paying attention to ICANN? They’re saying that IPv4 will be fully allocated in the next two or three years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people paying attention to ICANN? They’re saying that IPv4 will be fully allocated in the next two or three years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zajíc v pytli &#187; Archiv &#187; Nedávné změny ve světě IPv6</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2008/09/which-region-is-taking-the-lead-in-ipv6-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-15038</link>
		<dc:creator>Zajíc v pytli &#187; Archiv &#187; Nedávné změny ve světě IPv6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=365#comment-15038</guid>
		<description>[...] oficiálního blogu ICANN, mezinárodní organizace pro přidělené internetové názvy a čísla, vede v zavádění IPv6 Afrika. Protože takovéto prohlášení od jedné z nejdůležitějších organizací na internetu má [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] oficiálního blogu ICANN, mezinárodní organizace pro přidělené internetové názvy a čísla, vede v zavádění IPv6 Afrika. Protože takovéto prohlášení od jedné z nejdůležitějších organizací na internetu má [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Vegoda</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2008/09/which-region-is-taking-the-lead-in-ipv6-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-15037</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Vegoda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=365#comment-15037</guid>
		<description>Hi Olivier,

Thanks for your comment.

My experience is that ICANN staff, board and others are very interested and involved in addressing (pun intended) the issues surrounding IPv6. A lot of that work happens outside of ICANN meetings, though. Unsurprisingly, IPv6 adoption is a key issue for industry, regulators, governments and others. You&#039;ll often find us at these events.

Nonetheless, IPv6 was a key focus for the Paris meeting a few months ago.

One key reason for us going out to the operators, regulators and others is that they are the people involved in deployments, training and awareness raising. Particularly the operators.

Can you give examples of the sort of output you would expect the cross-constituency working group you mention above to come up with? What could it get ICANN to do to help speed up the rate of IPv6 adoption that isn&#039;t already being done by other groups? 

Leo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Olivier,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment.</p>
<p>My experience is that ICANN staff, board and others are very interested and involved in addressing (pun intended) the issues surrounding IPv6. A lot of that work happens outside of ICANN meetings, though. Unsurprisingly, IPv6 adoption is a key issue for industry, regulators, governments and others. You&#8217;ll often find us at these events.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, IPv6 was a key focus for the Paris meeting a few months ago.</p>
<p>One key reason for us going out to the operators, regulators and others is that they are the people involved in deployments, training and awareness raising. Particularly the operators.</p>
<p>Can you give examples of the sort of output you would expect the cross-constituency working group you mention above to come up with? What could it get ICANN to do to help speed up the rate of IPv6 adoption that isn&#8217;t already being done by other groups? </p>
<p>Leo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier Crepin-Leblond</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2008/09/which-region-is-taking-the-lead-in-ipv6-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-15035</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier Crepin-Leblond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=365#comment-15035</guid>
		<description>Thank you for covering this, Leo. 

My question is &quot;how long will it be before ICANN as an organisation recognises the seriousness of the problem?&quot;

ICANN has finally gotten the gTLD, IDNs &amp; ccTLD train moving and yet, we are still hearing issues of Names for most of the time at the Cairo conference and IPv4 / IPv6 is barely touched.

Rather than having individual voices from concerned members, attendees, and board members, is it not time to create a fast track cross-constituency working group to deal with the question:
&quot;What can ICANN do to facilitate, promote &amp; stabilise the migration to IPv6 - and for those that oppose the wording &quot;migration&quot;, I&#039;d word it as: &quot;the cohabitation of v4 and v6&quot;

Whilst your entry in the log is laudable, I wonder about the extent of official support there is behind it and about its purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for covering this, Leo. </p>
<p>My question is &#8220;how long will it be before ICANN as an organisation recognises the seriousness of the problem?&#8221;</p>
<p>ICANN has finally gotten the gTLD, IDNs &amp; ccTLD train moving and yet, we are still hearing issues of Names for most of the time at the Cairo conference and IPv4 / IPv6 is barely touched.</p>
<p>Rather than having individual voices from concerned members, attendees, and board members, is it not time to create a fast track cross-constituency working group to deal with the question:<br />
&#8220;What can ICANN do to facilitate, promote &amp; stabilise the migration to IPv6 &#8211; and for those that oppose the wording &#8220;migration&#8221;, I&#8217;d word it as: &#8220;the cohabitation of v4 and v6&#8243;</p>
<p>Whilst your entry in the log is laudable, I wonder about the extent of official support there is behind it and about its purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welke regio neemt het voortouw in IPv6-inzet? &#124; ISPam.nl</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2008/09/which-region-is-taking-the-lead-in-ipv6-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-14940</link>
		<dc:creator>Welke regio neemt het voortouw in IPv6-inzet? &#124; ISPam.nl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 06:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=365#comment-14940</guid>
		<description>[...] de blog van ICANN is een artikel verschenen over het IPv6 gebruik. Er is echter geen standaard manier om de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de blog van ICANN is een artikel verschenen over het IPv6 gebruik. Er is echter geen standaard manier om de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeroen Massar</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2008/09/which-region-is-taking-the-lead-in-ipv6-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-14936</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeroen Massar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=365#comment-14936</guid>
		<description>I actually think the numbers might be skewed even more because, I guess, a lot of networks that are in use in Africa are actually using non-African IP/ASNs. eg, a large ISP can just use their US-based address space there too and don&#039;t even have it registered in Africa. Then again, I am far from sure about this as I am don&#039;t have much to do with Africa. I know one thing to: there is no 6to4 in Africa, nor is there a Tunnel Broker. Thus even if there is IPv6, it stays in the networks that have it and I can&#039;t believe there is a huge population of actual users then (which is also something that is always the question: when it is there, is it actually used? and if so, how does one determine that it is used, meh, statistics ;).

What would be more interesting is looking at the population size, then determining the amount of IPv4 and IPv6 availability to end-users. I am fairly sure that the numbers are really low in the general case. Only thing I can guess is that Asia would have the largest amount of users, especially because of Korea, Japan and China. But those are only assumptions, no empirical evidence available at all :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think the numbers might be skewed even more because, I guess, a lot of networks that are in use in Africa are actually using non-African IP/ASNs. eg, a large ISP can just use their US-based address space there too and don&#8217;t even have it registered in Africa. Then again, I am far from sure about this as I am don&#8217;t have much to do with Africa. I know one thing to: there is no 6to4 in Africa, nor is there a Tunnel Broker. Thus even if there is IPv6, it stays in the networks that have it and I can&#8217;t believe there is a huge population of actual users then (which is also something that is always the question: when it is there, is it actually used? and if so, how does one determine that it is used, meh, statistics <img src='http://blog.icann.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>What would be more interesting is looking at the population size, then determining the amount of IPv4 and IPv6 availability to end-users. I am fairly sure that the numbers are really low in the general case. Only thing I can guess is that Asia would have the largest amount of users, especially because of Korea, Japan and China. But those are only assumptions, no empirical evidence available at all <img src='http://blog.icann.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Li2-Crystals</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2008/09/which-region-is-taking-the-lead-in-ipv6-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-14934</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Li2-Crystals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 00:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=365#comment-14934</guid>
		<description>[...] just saw something that kinda left me wondering. According to ICANN, Aftrica is leading the world in the adoption of IPV6 addressing. I realize that African ISPs and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just saw something that kinda left me wondering. According to ICANN, Aftrica is leading the world in the adoption of IPV6 addressing. I realize that African ISPs and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links List 10.3.08 &#124; ScienceLogic</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2008/09/which-region-is-taking-the-lead-in-ipv6-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-14933</link>
		<dc:creator>Links List 10.3.08 &#124; ScienceLogic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=365#comment-14933</guid>
		<description>[...] people paying attention to ICANN? They’re saying that IPv4 will be fully allocated in the next two or three years. Does anyone care? In their bid to make people care, ICANN talks about the state of IPv6 adoption [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] people paying attention to ICANN? They’re saying that IPv4 will be fully allocated in the next two or three years. Does anyone care? In their bid to make people care, ICANN talks about the state of IPv6 adoption [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
