Comments on: Why the DNS is broken, in plain language

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:05:57 +0000

If the Federal Governement asked ICANN to kill DNS- would ICANN do that?

If ICANN killed DNS, would the internet becomes useless for the majority of users?

Thank you for your help.

By: anonymus

anonymus — Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:42:29 +0000

Ahoy,
the link to John Dickensons tests, where he did that average of 1.3 seconds doesn’t work anymore. I’m not able to find a report about those tests. Do you have any closer information about the test conditions? The graph in the Cairo presentation isn’t that helpful.
Thanks, M.

By: Halı yıkama

Halı yıkama — Mon, 03 May 2010 21:46:35 +0000

halı yıkama koltuk yıkama halı tamiri

By: Douglas Otis

Douglas Otis — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:04:15 +0000

By allowing providers and authoritative servers to utilize SCTP as a default transport, instead of UDP, this would eliminate any possibility of blind spoofing attacks, such as those Dan Kaminsky demonstrated. SCTP would also prevent DNS or DNSSEC being used as a 60X amplifier for reflected attack. SCTP also supports an Auto-Close to automate persistent connections to reduce latency, and allows out-of-order processing and non-reliable delivery so servers do not need to retain in-flight data that is pending acknowledgment.

SCTP represents the future for the Internet. It offers improved error detection for Jumbo frames. Detects bus related bit-specific errors that TCP and UDP miss in 2% of the cases. SCTP is now used in critical infrastructure. There is 10 and 1 Gb/NIC providing SCTP off-loading. Processors even support its newer error checking as a single instruction. It is time for DNS to adopted SCTP as the preferred transport. The DNS message or the DNS protocol will otherwise remain unchanged, without there being any reliance upon port randomization.

By: Forum

Forum — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:17:14 +0000

teşekkürler yazı için thank thank

By: commonsense

commonsense — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:53:20 +0000

The internet. It runs on the OS designed by the phone company (UNIX, AT&T aka Bell), using the lines built for the telephone (Serial, ADSL, etc.) and later lines built for TV which relied on the structures built of the telephone lines (cable), using a numbers system (IP), just like the telephone. So what’s different? Letting someone else look up the numbers for you. That’s great for the folks back in the 80′s. But I don’t trust people to look up the numbers for me in the 00′s. Why should I? I can look up any number in 3 calls or less: 1. root 2. tld 3. node. After I save some of the numbers, I need not make more than one call. I do not need to be updated every 5 minutes. Nor do I need someone else’s “domain names”. I’ve got aliases. If the hosts file is so terrible, why is it still there, after 30 years? My guess is because IT WORKS. Which is more than I can say for DNS some of the time.

By: Dostluk

Dostluk — Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:09:33 +0000

hoş çalışma, tahnks

By: STUDENT COMUNITY OF COMPUTER SCIENCE INDONESIA

STUDENT COMUNITY OF COMPUTER SCIENCE INDONESIA — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:38:06 +0000

DNS is a the application of services in Internet translating a domain name to IP address.
For example, www for usage in Internet, then is typing name of domain, for example: yahoo.com
so would in mapping to a IP. Ex : 202.68.0.134. So DNS can be analogy at usage of telephone book,
where man who we recognize based on name of contact it we must dial in
telephone set. Same precisely, host computer sends queries in the form of name of computer and domain name server to DNS,
then by DNS is mapped to IP address.
if you want to know more about DNS just submit to
http://mr-amateur.co.cc part of the tips-trick…
thanks before…

By: Dereon Stephenson

Dereon Stephenson — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 13:21:51 +0000

Interesting, thanks for sharing this great post

By: Şömine

Şömine — Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:03:51 +0000

Thanks. This plain language makes me understand obliviously.