<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Local communities &#8230; not just governments.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.icann.org/2009/09/local-internet-communities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.icann.org/2009/09/local-internet-communities/</link>
	<description>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:42:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2009/09/local-internet-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-22962</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=1070#comment-22962</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Sniderman</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2009/09/local-internet-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-22870</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Sniderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=1070#comment-22870</guid>
		<description>Kim,
It seemed clear to me that your point that some are and some are not govt controlled was specifically in reference to the ccTLDs, rather than as a distinction between gTLDs and ccTLDs.  Am I correct in my understanding?

Steve,
Did you get the opposite impression? Was your understanding that the determining factor was that of gTLD (what you call global label) vs ccTLD?

Maybe I&#039;m missing something here, but just going by what you quoted here of your testimony it looks no different than what Kim said you said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim,<br />
It seemed clear to me that your point that some are and some are not govt controlled was specifically in reference to the ccTLDs, rather than as a distinction between gTLDs and ccTLDs.  Am I correct in my understanding?</p>
<p>Steve,<br />
Did you get the opposite impression? Was your understanding that the determining factor was that of gTLD (what you call global label) vs ccTLD?</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m missing something here, but just going by what you quoted here of your testimony it looks no different than what Kim said you said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KELECHI OKORIE</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2009/09/local-internet-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-22855</link>
		<dc:creator>KELECHI OKORIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=1070#comment-22855</guid>
		<description>Well written but I can tell you that in Nigeria here, the case is entirely different. There has been a conflict in the country for years over the countries domain name .ng. Even the government could not resolve it as there are different interests, taking different sides. We think is  time ICANN to help and resolve it for good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written but I can tell you that in Nigeria here, the case is entirely different. There has been a conflict in the country for years over the countries domain name .ng. Even the government could not resolve it as there are different interests, taking different sides. We think is  time ICANN to help and resolve it for good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kjt</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2009/09/local-internet-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-21745</link>
		<dc:creator>Kjt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=1070#comment-21745</guid>
		<description>As far as I know in China the situation is very similar with even greater percentage of non-latin users. So – what is the point? Is it demand of local communities or governments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know in China the situation is very similar with even greater percentage of non-latin users. So – what is the point? Is it demand of local communities or governments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ Pastore</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2009/09/local-internet-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-20909</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ Pastore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=1070#comment-20909</guid>
		<description>I find it extremely frustrating when there is limited access to contact ICANN. One can leave a general voice mail on the BLACKHOLE answer machine or send an email off in to cyberspace. It may as well go to outer space. I have written before and get no reply. How can the agency police the web when there is no conduit to send fraud complaints. This is typical of a bureaucracy to hide from the people it should be serving. We do pay the bill for you to exist, after all. 

SKYPE is a fraud and takes outrageous liberties. Don&#039;t install it in your computer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it extremely frustrating when there is limited access to contact ICANN. One can leave a general voice mail on the BLACKHOLE answer machine or send an email off in to cyberspace. It may as well go to outer space. I have written before and get no reply. How can the agency police the web when there is no conduit to send fraud complaints. This is typical of a bureaucracy to hide from the people it should be serving. We do pay the bill for you to exist, after all. </p>
<p>SKYPE is a fraud and takes outrageous liberties. Don&#8217;t install it in your computer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dasha Barinova</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2009/09/local-internet-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-19359</link>
		<dc:creator>Dasha Barinova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=1070#comment-19359</guid>
		<description>Dear Kim,

Could you, please, comment on the results of a survey, conducted in 2004 by American professor Michael Geist, in which of all 189 ITU member states, 66 countries responded with:
43% retain ultimate control over their national domain
49% said they are, or are considering, placing the domain on more formal governmental footing
7% or indicated no formal governmental control in their ccTLD with no plans to alter the present situation

Source -http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/forum/intgov04/contributions/governmentsandcctldsfeb04.pdf


Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Kim,</p>
<p>Could you, please, comment on the results of a survey, conducted in 2004 by American professor Michael Geist, in which of all 189 ITU member states, 66 countries responded with:<br />
43% retain ultimate control over their national domain<br />
49% said they are, or are considering, placing the domain on more formal governmental footing<br />
7% or indicated no formal governmental control in their ccTLD with no plans to alter the present situation</p>
<p>Source -http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/forum/intgov04/contributions/governmentsandcctldsfeb04.pdf</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2009/09/local-internet-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-19319</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=1070#comment-19319</guid>
		<description>Great info, thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great info, thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2009/09/local-internet-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-19202</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=1070#comment-19202</guid>
		<description>.RU domain which now goes beyond 2.300.000 runs by a non-profit organization and has nothing to do with government control.  The organization itself counrols by the Board, elected from local internet activists every year. We demand IDN for Russia, simply because 70% of population uncomfortable with latin script. And we do have support from government on highest level. But it doesn&#039;t mean we are under control.  
As far as I know in China the situation is very similar with even greater percentage of non-latin users.  So - what is the point? Is it demand of local communities or governments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.RU domain which now goes beyond 2.300.000 runs by a non-profit organization and has nothing to do with government control.  The organization itself counrols by the Board, elected from local internet activists every year. We demand IDN for Russia, simply because 70% of population uncomfortable with latin script. And we do have support from government on highest level. But it doesn&#8217;t mean we are under control.<br />
As far as I know in China the situation is very similar with even greater percentage of non-latin users.  So &#8211; what is the point? Is it demand of local communities or governments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Davies</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2009/09/local-internet-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-19193</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=1070#comment-19193</guid>
		<description>Jonathan,

Sorry, we don&#039;t actively track the regulatory environments in each country in relation to their ccTLD operation. It is, however, an element of our evaluation when we receive a delegaton or redelegation request for a ccTLD.

Kim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan,</p>
<p>Sorry, we don&#8217;t actively track the regulatory environments in each country in relation to their ccTLD operation. It is, however, an element of our evaluation when we receive a delegaton or redelegation request for a ccTLD.</p>
<p>Kim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Davies</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2009/09/local-internet-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-19192</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=1070#comment-19192</guid>
		<description>Elisabeth,

I am not sure the distinction you are trying to make. IANA had no legal personality then, and has no legal personality now. I am not sure the fact it required less staff resources in the 1990&#039;s than today changes the facts.

Kim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elisabeth,</p>
<p>I am not sure the distinction you are trying to make. IANA had no legal personality then, and has no legal personality now. I am not sure the fact it required less staff resources in the 1990&#8242;s than today changes the facts.</p>
<p>Kim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

