<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WCIT&#8230;In Conclusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.icann.org/2012/12/wcit-in-conclusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.icann.org/2012/12/wcit-in-conclusion/</link>
	<description>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 14:54:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Ndonnang</title>
		<link>http://blog.icann.org/2012/12/wcit-in-conclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-28611</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Ndonnang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.icann.org/?p=5141#comment-28611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Fadi,

Thank you very much for sharing with us the ICANN view on the WCIT-12 conclusion.

This conclusion is a proof of your excellent work during this conference and your commitment to keep the ICANN open to all even to those who want  to interfere in its work.  I humbly like to congratulate you for that. It is a very good news to know clearly that the ITU has no desire to play a role in critical Internet resources. I hope it is forever! 
There were or there was a desire from some governments like our government in Cameroon to control distribution of IP addresses within the country, I hope this clear statement of the ITU Secretary General will stop that desire.

From others views, It seems like the WCIT-12 was definitely about the ITU &quot;controlling the Internet&quot; but not the ITU &quot;controlling the work of ICANN&quot;. Others I-organisations like the Internet Society was disappointed with the outcome of the conference and the content of the revisited ITRs.  Definitely the consensus did not lead the WCIT-12. Can you share a little more your thoughts on that? I hope you will have time for that.

Thank you very much for your great work.
Best regards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Fadi,</p>
<p>Thank you very much for sharing with us the ICANN view on the WCIT-12 conclusion.</p>
<p>This conclusion is a proof of your excellent work during this conference and your commitment to keep the ICANN open to all even to those who want  to interfere in its work.  I humbly like to congratulate you for that. It is a very good news to know clearly that the ITU has no desire to play a role in critical Internet resources. I hope it is forever!<br />
There were or there was a desire from some governments like our government in Cameroon to control distribution of IP addresses within the country, I hope this clear statement of the ITU Secretary General will stop that desire.</p>
<p>From others views, It seems like the WCIT-12 was definitely about the ITU &#8220;controlling the Internet&#8221; but not the ITU &#8220;controlling the work of ICANN&#8221;. Others I-organisations like the Internet Society was disappointed with the outcome of the conference and the content of the revisited ITRs.  Definitely the consensus did not lead the WCIT-12. Can you share a little more your thoughts on that? I hope you will have time for that.</p>
<p>Thank you very much for your great work.<br />
Best regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
